Workshops
Visual Sovereignty: Indigenous Film and Visual Culture
This workshop proposes an investigation into the current intellectual
and theoretical trends in Film and Visual Culture, as it applies to Indigenous
filmmakers, photographers, choreographers, dancers, writers, and theorists.
Through a series of core monthly meetings, proposed guest lectures, and
film screenings, this workshop will demonstrate and consider the role
of visual culture in the reproduction and production of Indigenous images
by both Indigenous peoples in the Americas, and by non-Indigenous entities.
While the latter has created stereotyped place-holders for cultural, gendered,
religious, and racial denigration, the former foregrounds the strong presence
of Indigenous people in the production of their own images, reflecting
their own worldview. This proposed workshop asserts privileging Indigenous
visual sovereignty and self-determination, and seeks to engage a variety
of fields in such an endeavor. Visual sovereignty, like intellectual and
political sovereignty, necessitates an Indigenous community’s or
individual’s right to visually create a space for self-definition
and determination. The following fields will serve as the workshop’s
target audience: Dance, Film & Visual Culture, Ethnic Studies, Native
American Studies, History, English, Women’s Studies, and Performance
Studies. Additionally, the CHASS Connect Program Director, Dr. Geoff Cohen,
has agreed to publicize any guest lectures related to this proposed workshop
to his student body (currently 480) and to offer extra credit to students
for attending these talks. Such an agreement would foster relationships
not only with the departments listed above, but also with the body of
undergraduate humanities students.
Specific projects within the workshop seek to address:
- filmic representations of Hopis, Pueblos of New Mexico, Apaches,
and Navajos. This project seeks to investigate films in relationship
to the geographies, languages, and material culture of these tribes,
and specifically the use of Monument Valley as a site to film many tribes
who are not, historically or contemporarily, situated in that place
- a content analysis of radio novels produced by Taller Historia Oral
Andino (in Aymara and Spanish): how they contribute to the notion of
the ideal indigenous woman from the standpoint of traditional Aymara
philosophy and social organization that is being reclaimed and renovated
in Bolivia; filmmaking in Bolivia by indigenous people, that dramatize
traditional stories and update them to comment on contemporary issues,
or that present entirely new dramas that explore contemporary life from
an indigenous optic.
- the function of Native and First Nation film and photography as visual
sites of genetic/blood memory that incite imaginative genesis. Such
an approach throws into relief and combats the non-Native approach to
Native people and visual representations as ethnographic spectacles,
and demonstrates the role of the visual as both document and anti-document
of Native families, communities and individuals. In other words, access
is granted to the stories imbedded in these visual sites through genetic
memory, not ephemera/paper documents; however, they are also material
records of Native presence, as are the written narratives (Native literature)
that are products of these sites. This seeming tension is not necessarily
a tension at all: it merely suggests a re-coded relationship between
visual and written narratives that privileges Native and Indigenous
modes of memory and imagination
- the portrayal of mixed race Native people in popular films, especially
anxieties that surround filmic representations of mixed race Native
women
- the role of dance in Native Hawaiian life as a life force that is
housed in individual bodies and communicates collective memory; the
hula catalyzes both an ideological and material transformation within
the dancer and his or her collective community
- the reliance on government issued documentation in the construction
of “authentic” Indigenous representations in films by non-Indigenous
“experts,” and the function of Indigenous filmic projects
that explicitly situate Indigenous people as the “experts”
in Indigenous films
|